Maryland Must Act: The Legislature Cannot Ignore the Systemic Failures Exposed by Clarke v. Gibson
The Maryland Supreme Court's ruling in Clarke v. Gibson reveals critical flaws in the state's protective-order system, which often deprives parents of rights without sufficient evidence. To restore fairness, lawmakers must implement statutory reforms,…
After Clarke v. Gibson: What Maryland’s Landmark Ruling Means for False Accusations and Custody Warfare
The Maryland Supreme Court's decision in Clarke v. Gibson mandates that protective orders must be supported by substantial evidence rather than assumptions or credibility findings. This ruling addresses the misuse of protective orders in custody…
Courtroom PTSD: How High-Conflict Custody Battles Create Lifelong Trauma
Family court trauma is real—and it's destroying lives. This article exposes how high-conflict custody battles cause long-term psychological damage, especially for parents with CPTSD, ADHD, or trauma history. Learn how the legal system punishes the…
What Every Parent Must Know Before Entering Family Court
Family court in America is unique and carries significant risks for unprepared parents. It operates on discretion rather than strict rules, making truth insufficient for protection. False allegations are common, and legal representation may not guarantee…
Disability Advocates Condemn New York Court of Appeals and Judge Anthony Cannataro for Denying Disabled Father Access to Justice
On November 19, 2025, New York's highest court dismissed Marc Fishman's appeal for ADA accommodations, claiming it lacked jurisdiction. Advocates decry this ruling as systemic discrimination, highlighting that state courts can ignore federal mandates.…