Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
Family & State

News at the Intersection of Family and Government

Family & State

News at the Intersection of Family and Government

  • Home
  • About
    • Archive
    • Not a Substitute for an Attorney
    • Press & Media Inquiries
    • Press Releases
    • Services
    • Substack Feed
  • Start Here
  • Latest News
  • Investigations
    • California Investigations
      • California’s Broken Public Defense System
        • Public Records
      • Inside People v. Smiel
        • Analysis & Commentary – People v. Smiel
        • Resources – People v. Smiel
        • Support & Action – People v. Smiel
      • Inside the California Custody Cartel
    • International Investigations
    • Low Country Family Court Corruption
    • Marc Fishman – The Justice Warrior
    • Maryland Child Welfare & Foster Care
      • News & Reporting (Md. Child Welfare)
      • Public Records (Md. Child Welfare)
    • Maryland Domestic Violence
      • Clarke v. Gibson
    • Reichert v. Hornbeck: A Father’s Fight for Truth, Custody, and Justice
      • Reichert v. Hornbeck Updates
    • Still Here
    • Stolen Holidays
    • The Crimes That Never Happened
    • The McPhail Papers: How a Fit Mississippi Father Was Imprisoned for Six Years Without a Hearing
    • Why Family Court Reform Keeps Failing
  • Projects
    • Project ADA
      • News & Analysis
    • Project CONSTITUTION
      • Essays
    • Project EXILE
      • News & Reporting (EXILE)
      • The Exile Wall
    • Project GUARDIAN
      • Case Files
      • Education Watch
    • Project HAVEN
      • Abuse & Justice News
      • The Origin Archive
      • The Shadow Reports
    • Project IMAGE
      • Media Watch
      • Reframed
    • Project INNOCENCE
      • Investigations
      • The System
    • Project LEGACY
      • Essays & Reporting (LEGACY)
    • Project LIVELIHOOD
    • Project STEWARDSHIP
      • Project STEWARDSHIP
    • Project SYSTEM
      • Family Court 101
      • Procedural Harm: How Family Court Erases Parents Without Saying No
      • The Litigant Experience
      • The Patterns of Family Court: What Every Case Keeps Revealing
        • The Patterns Series
    • The Military Family Justice Project
      • Data Library (MFJP)
      • Military Family Court Exposé
      • News & Reporting (MFJP)
      • Project Blueprint: Data Story Dashboard
    • The Unseen Project
      • The Mission (Unseen)
  • Voices & Editorials
    • Editorials
      • Editorial Standards
    • Letters to the Editor
      • Letters to the Editor Policy
    • Voices: Guest Perspectives
    • Contributor Agreement
    • Submission Guidelines
  • Support
  • Submit a Tip
  • Home
  • About
    • Archive
    • Not a Substitute for an Attorney
    • Press & Media Inquiries
    • Press Releases
    • Services
    • Substack Feed
  • Start Here
  • Latest News
  • Investigations
    • California Investigations
      • California’s Broken Public Defense System
        • Public Records
      • Inside People v. Smiel
        • Analysis & Commentary – People v. Smiel
        • Resources – People v. Smiel
        • Support & Action – People v. Smiel
      • Inside the California Custody Cartel
    • International Investigations
    • Low Country Family Court Corruption
    • Marc Fishman – The Justice Warrior
    • Maryland Child Welfare & Foster Care
      • News & Reporting (Md. Child Welfare)
      • Public Records (Md. Child Welfare)
    • Maryland Domestic Violence
      • Clarke v. Gibson
    • Reichert v. Hornbeck: A Father’s Fight for Truth, Custody, and Justice
      • Reichert v. Hornbeck Updates
    • Still Here
    • Stolen Holidays
    • The Crimes That Never Happened
    • The McPhail Papers: How a Fit Mississippi Father Was Imprisoned for Six Years Without a Hearing
    • Why Family Court Reform Keeps Failing
  • Projects
    • Project ADA
      • News & Analysis
    • Project CONSTITUTION
      • Essays
    • Project EXILE
      • News & Reporting (EXILE)
      • The Exile Wall
    • Project GUARDIAN
      • Case Files
      • Education Watch
    • Project HAVEN
      • Abuse & Justice News
      • The Origin Archive
      • The Shadow Reports
    • Project IMAGE
      • Media Watch
      • Reframed
    • Project INNOCENCE
      • Investigations
      • The System
    • Project LEGACY
      • Essays & Reporting (LEGACY)
    • Project LIVELIHOOD
    • Project STEWARDSHIP
      • Project STEWARDSHIP
    • Project SYSTEM
      • Family Court 101
      • Procedural Harm: How Family Court Erases Parents Without Saying No
      • The Litigant Experience
      • The Patterns of Family Court: What Every Case Keeps Revealing
        • The Patterns Series
    • The Military Family Justice Project
      • Data Library (MFJP)
      • Military Family Court Exposé
      • News & Reporting (MFJP)
      • Project Blueprint: Data Story Dashboard
    • The Unseen Project
      • The Mission (Unseen)
  • Voices & Editorials
    • Editorials
      • Editorial Standards
    • Letters to the Editor
      • Letters to the Editor Policy
    • Voices: Guest Perspectives
    • Contributor Agreement
    • Submission Guidelines
  • Support
  • Submit a Tip
  • https://www.facebook.com/
  • https://twitter.com/
  • https://t.me/
  • https://www.instagram.com/
  • https://youtube.com/

Inside the California Custody Cartel

How a Silicon Valley mother lost her son in a private courtroom designed to profit from her pain.

Book cover featuring silhouettes of a parent and child alongside a scale of justice, with the title 'Inside the California Custody Cartel' by Michael Phillips.

By Michael Phillips | Father & Co.

California’s family courts are selling justice to the highest bidder — one custody evaluation at a time.


The California Custody Cartel

An Investigative Series by Father & Co.

Across California, family courts are quietly turning mental health and disability into mechanisms of control.
Behind the language of “therapy,” “reunification,” and “high-conflict parenting,” a network of private judges, court-appointed evaluators, and AFCC-affiliated therapists has built a profit system that thrives on family conflict and ignores federal ADA protections.

Parents who disclose ADHD, PTSD, or trauma are labeled “unstable,” stripped of custody, and forced into endless psychological evaluations that enrich the very professionals who recommend them.
The result is a privatized justice market — one that sells access, punishes neurodivergence, and hides its abuses behind confidentiality orders and private judging platforms like JAMS.

This series begins with Brenna Gano, a Bay Area mother whose ADHD diagnosis was weaponized to justify removing her son. Her case — involving AFCC consultants such as Dr. Matthew Sullivan and a retired private judge at JAMS — reveals how California’s family-court industry profits from disability discrimination and coerced therapy. The pattern echoes cases across the nation, from San Diego to New York, all the way to the family of Yale psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee.


Follow the Full Investigation

👉 Inside the California Custody Cartel (Part I)
👉 The Psychiatric Weapon: How Mental Health Was Turned into a Weapon of Control
👉 News & Reports
👉 Public Records & Case Files

Brenna’s January hearing in San Mateo could determine whether California’s private-judge system finally faces public accountability — or whether the business model remains intact.


If you’ve faced similar tactics — psychological evaluations, reunification therapy, or private judging in California — Father & Co. is documenting these cases.
📧 Email us confidentially at tips@fatherand.co.

About
Father & Co. is an independent journalism and advocacy platform dedicated to rebuilding trust between parents, children, and the systems meant to protect them.
We report the stories others won’t—on family courts, child welfare, disability rights, and constitutional accountability.
→ Learn More

  • About Father & Co.
  • Our Mission
  • Editorial Standards
  • Who We Cover / What We Investigate
  • Contact
  • Corrections & Clarifications

Father & Co. documents family-court systems, parental rights, and due-process failures—through reporting, pattern analysis, and lived experience.

  • Support Our Work
  • Subscribe (Newsletter / Substack)
  • Membership
  • Donate
  • Partner With Us
  • Follow Us
    • X / Twitter
    • Substack
    • YouTube (if applicable)

Independent journalism. No legal advice. No paid outcomes.

Copyright 2026 — Family & State. All rights reserved. Blogsy WordPress Theme

Loading Comments...