The Chatbot in the Courtroom: What AI Means for the Parent Representing Themselves
Family courts often see a high rate of self-representation, with many turning to AI tools like ChatGPT for legal advice. While AI offers accessible help, it also poses risks, such as providing incorrect information or compromising legal privilege.…
The Access Gap AI Was Supposed to Close — And What It’s Opening Instead
A recent appellate court case highlighted issues with AI-generated citations in custody matters, revealing a trend where self-represented litigants submit filings containing fabricated legal references. This problem threatens the grace doctrine, which…
When AI Lies to the Court, Families Pay the Price: Lessons From Pennsylvania
Artificial intelligence is being promoted to enhance access to justice for self-represented litigants, but a Pennsylvania scandal reveals its dangers. AI-generated errors in court filings, particularly affecting parents, lead to unfair outcomes and…
When AI Errors Collide With Family Court: What an Oregon Case Means for Parents Fighting Alone
An Oregon judge fined an attorney $2,000 for submitting AI-generated filings with false information, highlighting risks for parents in family court, especially fathers in custody battles. Mistakes can severely impact parenting rights. The case calls for…