The Chatbot in the Courtroom: What AI Means for the Parent Representing Themselves
Family courts often see a high rate of self-representation, with many turning to AI tools like ChatGPT for legal advice. While AI offers accessible help, it also poses risks, such as providing incorrect information or compromising legal privilege.…
AI-Created Case Law, Real Consequences: A Federal Warning Parents Should Not Ignore
A federal court case highlights the dangers of AI-generated legal documents following a brief that cited non-existent case law, leading to sanctions against five attorneys. The ruling stresses the importance of verifying legal citations for credibility,…
Accountability and Professionalism in Family Law: Lessons from a Baltimore County Disbarment
The Maryland Supreme Court disbarred divorce lawyer Judith Marie Hamilton for abandoning a client, mishandling funds, and failing to cooperate with investigations. This case highlights the need for ethical conduct in family law, stressing that lawyers…
When AI Lies to the Court, Families Pay the Price: Lessons From Pennsylvania
Artificial intelligence is being promoted to enhance access to justice for self-represented litigants, but a Pennsylvania scandal reveals its dangers. AI-generated errors in court filings, particularly affecting parents, lead to unfair outcomes and…
AI Enters the Family Courtroom—But It Won’t Replace Judgment in 2026
By 2026, AI will serve as a supportive tool in family courts, aiding overwhelmed litigants while ensuring human discretion remains central, particularly in decisions affecting children. Adoption will focus on low-risk functions and self-represented…
When AI Errors Collide With Family Court: What an Oregon Case Means for Parents Fighting Alone
An Oregon judge fined an attorney $2,000 for submitting AI-generated filings with false information, highlighting risks for parents in family court, especially fathers in custody battles. Mistakes can severely impact parenting rights. The case calls for…