False Paternity, Real Consequences: Georgia Case Highlights a Blind Spot in Child Support Trust
A Georgia case highlights issues in family law regarding child support claims, where Brya Hardy fraudulently collected $7,000 by falsely claiming her ex-boyfriend was the father of her child. Investigations revealed the child was unrelated. This incident…
The Litigation Spiral: When Court Becomes Control
Abusive litigation in family courts extends conflict instead of resolving it, creating a "litigation spiral" that drains resources and undermines parental relationships. This cycle is marked by strategic delays and excessive filings, often benefiting the…
Tennessee’s County-Level Gun Relinquishment Fix Highlights a Larger Due Process Debate
Tennessee is implementing changes to firearm transfer documentation for individuals with domestic violence convictions or protection orders, aiming to close loopholes and improve compliance. While advocates highlight the need for stricter enforcement,…
Brooklyn Family Court Ends Compulsion — But an Autistic Child Remains Missing
A Brooklyn Family Court ruling has relieved Jacqueline Pritchett, mother of missing Jacob Pritchett, of any legal obligation to testify about her son. While upholding constitutional rights, this leaves law enforcement with little recourse in a case…
When the Safety Net Frays: Nebraska’s Murder-Suicide Spike Exposes a Broader Crisis
A sharp rise in murder-suicides in Nebraska during 2025 exposes what happens when domestic violence services, protection order enforcement, and mental health intervention all fall short at once—leaving families, especially children, to bear the cost.
Why Family Court Reform Can’t Keep Reporters in the Room
Family court coverage suffers due to journalists facing intense hostility from both institutions and advocates, leading to attrition. Reporting challenges, such as sealed records and backlash, discourage continued coverage. Advocates' demands for…
Trauma Is Not a Strategy: Why Family Court Reform Keeps Burning Its Own Leaders
Family court reform struggles due to trauma-driven dynamics that prioritize emotional intensity over strategic effectiveness. Pain and anger from survivors often lead to distrust, rejecting moderates or insiders who challenge views. Successful movements…
Why Family Court Reform Movements Keep Turning on Each Other
Family court reform faces significant internal strife among advocates, splitting into factions that distrust each other. Emotional trauma complicates unity, particularly around the contentious issue of parental alienation. Competing gender narratives and…
Idaho’s Child Welfare Debate: Protection, Profit, and the Limits of State Power
In Idaho, a debate over child welfare raises concerns about the system prioritizing family separation over protection. Critics argue that financial incentives promote removals, undermining parental rights and due process. Controversial cases like Baby…
Is 2026 the Year for Real Family Court Reform?
As 2026 approaches, the hope for sweeping family court reforms faces disappointment. The focus should shift from symbolic changes to evidence-based, state-specific reforms that prioritize child safety and confront false allegations. A pragmatic blueprint…