A Paper Doesn’t Stop a Bullet. A False Accusation Helps Pull the Trigger.
Three Maryland cases reveal the same systemic failure: protective orders that identify danger but cannot stop it. At the same time, false filings dilute the system’s ability to respond to real threats — leaving children to bear the cost.
When Systems Miss the Warning Signs: Why Indiana’s “Gabby Petito Act” Matters to Families
The article discusses Indiana's House Bill 1310, the “Gabby Petito Act,” which mandates lethality assessments by officers responding to domestic violence calls. It highlights the importance of recognizing risks to children in such situations and…
Tennessee’s County-Level Gun Relinquishment Fix Highlights a Larger Due Process Debate
Tennessee is implementing changes to firearm transfer documentation for individuals with domestic violence convictions or protection orders, aiming to close loopholes and improve compliance. While advocates highlight the need for stricter enforcement,…
What Clarke v. Gibson Really Means for Domestic Violence Survivors: Stronger Protections, Clearer Evidence, and a More Stable Path to Safety
The Maryland Supreme Court's decision in Clarke v. Gibson strengthens protections for domestic violence survivors by ensuring that protective orders are based on evidence and not merely on disbelief. This ruling clarifies the requirements for stability…
Coercive Control Laws Are Expanding — But Are They Protecting Families or Tearing Them Apart?
New legislation on domestic violence focusing on coercive control has raised concerns about its subjective nature, enabling potential abuse in custody disputes. Critics argue that vague terms empower false accusations, risking due process for accused…