When Lawmakers Choose Judges: Why South Carolina’s Judicial Reform Fight Matters to Families
In South Carolina, judicial reform is a pressing issue, particularly for families navigating family court. The current system, where lawmakers elect judges with limited accountability, raises concerns about transparency and potential insider favoritism.…
Pennsylvania Custody Exchange Ends in Tragedy, Raising Questions About Family Court Safety Failures
A post-Christmas custody exchange in Pennsylvania turned deadly, renewing concerns about why family courts continue to allow unsupervised exchanges in high-conflict cases.
Alabama Judge Sentencing Case Shows Why Accuracy—and Accountability—Still Matter
Gilbert P. Self, a former judge in Alabama, was sentenced to 12 years in prison for misusing public funds, not the misleading "50 years" reported by some outlets. The case emphasizes the need for accurate reporting to maintain trust in the justice…