Why Family Court Reform Movements Keep Turning on Each Other
Family court reform faces significant internal strife among advocates, splitting into factions that distrust each other. Emotional trauma complicates unity, particularly around the contentious issue of parental alienation. Competing gender narratives and…
Is 2026 the Year for Real Family Court Reform?
As 2026 approaches, the hope for sweeping family court reforms faces disappointment. The focus should shift from symbolic changes to evidence-based, state-specific reforms that prioritize child safety and confront false allegations. A pragmatic blueprint…
When Family Court Turns Criminal: The Cost of Standing Close to the Truth
When family court cases drift into criminal territory, truth can become a liability rather than a safeguard. This editorial reflects on the cost of access, the ethics of proximity, and the difficult balance between advocacy, documentation, and…
EDITORIAL: When Being There Becomes the Problem
Many men face a quiet crisis when their emotional support becomes expected and controlling. While praised for being available, they may later become scapegoats for others' trauma, leading to confusion and aggression. Understanding boundaries and…
Maryland Must Act: The Legislature Cannot Ignore the Systemic Failures Exposed by Clarke v. Gibson
The Maryland Supreme Court's ruling in Clarke v. Gibson reveals critical flaws in the state's protective-order system, which often deprives parents of rights without sufficient evidence. To restore fairness, lawmakers must implement statutory reforms,…
EDITORIAL | The Silence Is Over: Why Parents Must Take Back the Narrative
America’s family courts have operated in secrecy for decades, often disregarding parents, especially fathers, while reshaping childhoods without public oversight. Father & Co. aims to empower parents' voices and expose the system's flaws, demanding…