The New Indentured Class: How Family Court Creates Modern Slavery
The family court system in America is compared to modern slavery, as it strips parents of their rights, finances, and identities without due process. Coercive practices lead to financial ruin, loss of custody, and criminalization for non-criminal acts.…
The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom.
Los Angeles and San Diego officials are withholding public records related to the arrest and prosecution of Giselle Farias Smiel, raising concerns about transparency and due process. This refusal undermines public trust in law enforcement and the justice…
When the System Falters: What Nevada’s Family Court Survey Reveals About the Stakes for Parents and Children
Family courts, especially in Clark County, Nevada, fail many parents who expect fairness and safety, as highlighted by alarming judicial performance data. With unmonitored judges and no feedback from self-represented litigants, parents' experiences…
What South Carolina’s Family Court Battle Teaches Every Father Fighting to Stay in His Child’s Life
Rom Reddy's op-ed addresses the systemic challenges fathers face in family courts, highlighting issues like unsubstantiated allegations and court biases leading to unfair custody arrangements. He advocates for a 50/50 parenting presumption in South…
When Power Shifts at the Top, Families Feel It First: What Trump v. Slaughter Means for Parents, Rights, and Everyday Justice
The Supreme Court case Trump v. Slaughter, argued on December 8, 2025, could drastically alter the independence of federal agencies like the FTC and SEC. This change impacts families relying on social security, workplace rights, and consumer protections.…
After Clarke v. Gibson: What Maryland’s Landmark Ruling Means for False Accusations and Custody Warfare
The Maryland Supreme Court's decision in Clarke v. Gibson mandates that protective orders must be supported by substantial evidence rather than assumptions or credibility findings. This ruling addresses the misuse of protective orders in custody…
When Protective Orders Hide Evidence, Families Pay the Price
In California, protective orders are increasingly misused, restricting parents’ access to evidence in criminal cases, thus affecting their ability to defend themselves in custody disputes. The trend disproportionately impacts marginalized parents and…
Maryland Supreme Court Issues Major Protective-Order Ruling: Clarke v. Gibson Resets the Standard for Evidence, Due Process, and Parental Rights
The Maryland Supreme Court’s Clarke v. Gibson ruling strengthens due process protections in protective-order cases and demands real evidence before restricting parental rights.
When AI Errors Collide With Family Court: What an Oregon Case Means for Parents Fighting Alone
An Oregon judge fined an attorney $2,000 for submitting AI-generated filings with false information, highlighting risks for parents in family court, especially fathers in custody battles. Mistakes can severely impact parenting rights. The case calls for…
When Courts Violate Federal Law: The Hidden Civil-Rights Crisis Facing Disabled Litigants in America
The American court system increasingly fails disabled litigants, violating the ADA's requirements for meaningful access and accommodations. This results in life-altering consequences, as courts often dismiss, punish, or ignore disabilities. Project ADA…