When Family Court Proceeds Without a Parent, That’s Not “Non-Appearance.” It’s Exclusion.
Jeff Reichert's case highlights how family courts can proceed without a parent, effectively erasing them from the process due to denied accommodations for disabilities. A federal judge acknowledged the need for remote participation under disability law,…
AI as Accommodation in the Courtroom: Why Self-Represented Litigants Need Support, Not Suspicion
The article highlights the challenges faced by self-represented litigants in family and civil courts, where the legal system assumes knowledge of complex processes. It argues that AI tools can enhance accessibility and support, allowing these individuals…
Florida Bill Targets a Quiet Family Court Problem: Punishing Parents for Legal Medical Care
A proposed Florida bill aims to protect parents who use medical marijuana from having their custody or visitation rights unfairly restricted. The legislation asserts that medical marijuana use should not automatically be deemed harmful, requiring…
A “Temporary” Order That Never Ended: Lawsuit Highlights Four Years of Father–Child Separation in Maryland
A lawsuit in Baltimore County highlights the issue of temporary family court orders becoming permanent, resulting in prolonged separation between a father, Jeff Reichert, and his son, Grant. Reichert claims a no-contact order led to nearly four years of…
Steny Hoyer Retires — And the ADA Legacy That Defined His Career
Steny Hoyer's legacy in Congress is primarily linked to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, which he helped champion as a chief sponsor. The ADA transformed access and inclusion for millions of people with disabilities, although…
When Police Ignore Disability Accommodations, Families Pay the Price
A federal appeal highlights the systemic issue of disabled parents being denied necessary accommodations during police encounters, particularly in custody disputes. Marc H. Fishman's case illustrates how such denials can lead to misunderstandings and…
When Accessibility Becomes Optional: The White House ASL Interpreter Fight and America’s Disability Enforcement Gap
Federal court rulings requiring the White House to provide ASL interpreters for briefings highlight systemic issues in disability rights enforcement in the U.S. The American Sign Language debate reflects broader patterns where compliance with…
“You Can’t Take Someone’s Children Without a Real Lawyer”: What New York’s Landmark Ruling Means for Parents Fighting for Their Families
The New York Court of Appeals' ruling in the Matter of Parker J. highlights the systemic failures of family courts that can unjustly sever parental rights. It asserts the necessity of effective legal representation, particularly for marginalized parents.…
When Power Shifts at the Top, Families Feel It First: What Trump v. Slaughter Means for Parents, Rights, and Everyday Justice
The Supreme Court case Trump v. Slaughter, argued on December 8, 2025, could drastically alter the independence of federal agencies like the FTC and SEC. This change impacts families relying on social security, workplace rights, and consumer protections.…
When Courts Violate Federal Law: The Hidden Civil-Rights Crisis Facing Disabled Litigants in America
The American court system increasingly fails disabled litigants, violating the ADA's requirements for meaningful access and accommodations. This results in life-altering consequences, as courts often dismiss, punish, or ignore disabilities. Project ADA…